MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Start a discussion about the appendices or other MPEP subject matter not encompassed by the other active topics by clicking the Submit New Idea button on the left. You can read the MPEP on the USPTO website.

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Implement Friendly URLs on mpep.uspto.gov

The URLs for the http://mpep.uspto.gov site are not currently friendly and it can be difficult to determine what a link might lead you to. The link for MPEP 1200 is currently: http://mpep.uspto.gov/RDMS/detail/manual/MPEP/current/d0e18.xml#/manual/MPEP/DC1_FPindexR-07.2015/d0e122292.xml It would be helpful if it were something more like this: http://mpep.uspto.gov/e9r072015/MPEP/1200 The link for 35 USC 101 is currently: ...more »

Submitted by (@nkopp0)
2 comments

Voting

7 votes
7 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Indicia case law

A decision was rendered in 1954 pertaining to indicia. In re Montgomery states: Patentable novelty cannot be principally predicated on mere printed matter and arrangements thereof, but must reside basically in physical structure. In re Montgomery, 102 USPQ 248 (CCPA 1954). Although this decision is old, it is pertinent in today's world, whether in displays where an application is trying to patent the word "caution" over ...more »

Submitted by (@kristina.junge)
6 comments

Voting

5 votes
5 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Add a consolidated subject-matter eligibility guidance appendix

The eligibility pages at https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/examination-policy/subject-matter-eligibility and https://www.uspto.gov/patent/laws-and-regulations/examination-policy/subject-matter-eligibility-examination-guidance-date are very helpful. However, as the number of documents grows, the tedium of citing them weighs more and more heavily. Would the editors please consider including a regularly-updated ...more »

Submitted by (@chrisw)
1 comment

Voting

2 votes
2 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Add PPH to the Subject Matter Index

PPH (708.02(c), Nov. 2015) isn't mentioned by name in the Subject Matter Index. Would you please add it, and relevant other terms? For example, "highway" also isn't in the index. Thanks!

Submitted by (@chrisw)
2 comments

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Add "MPEP TOC" bookmarks to the PDF Subject Matter Index

In the PDF files, Subject Matter Index, Nov. 2015 (mpep-9090-subject-matter-index.pdf), the Bookmarks do not include the expandable "MPEP TOC" to provide direct access to other MPEP sections. Would you please add them? Thanks!

Submitted by (@chrisw)
4 comments

Voting

1 vote
1 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Email notice for updating on Private PAIR

The patent list page on Private PAIR can not show most updated date of document from USPTO for a particulary application, and misslead user think there is not new document or notice from USPTO. Even worse I just received same notice letter which has gone thru over two month to reach me and overdue. To improve the system, it is ideally to set the system automatically send an email to remind the account holder to check ...more »

Submitted by (@motioautomation)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

File Name of Zip file should be changed

The zip file containing the March 2014 version of the 9th edition of the MPEP still uses the name of the previous version, ie. e9r-11-2013.zip.

 

It would be less confusing if the name was consistent with the current version.

Submitted by (@vortekx)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Revision number should reflect latest update

R-07.2015 has a 10/2015 publication and an 11/2015 publication. The two publications differ in substance, not merely in form. For ease and clarity of citation, I suggest the revision number match the publication date in the future. Alternatively, I suggest the MPEP be referred to primarily by a publication date (e.g., "E9 P-11.2015") rather than a revision number. I understand that presently the "R" number is the ...more »

Submitted by (@chrisw)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Add an appendix for the FULL TEXT of every court case cited.

Alternatively, amend appendix II to include the text of all of the cited court cases.

Submitted by (@justin.blaufeld)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Guidance on language describing best practices/requirements

In the Introduction to the MPEP (or whatever prefatory section is preferred), add a short section on which terms are requirements and which describe best practice. Those without legal training sometimes interpret the term "should" similarly to the term "must." This seems to lead to confusion and complaints from those MPEP readers that the MPEP is "confusing" or "self-contradictory." Although some readers of the MPEP ...more »

Submitted by (@jasonliao)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

MISCELLANEOUS - Appendices and Other

Introduction: clarify what "the rules" do

Introduction (Nov. 2015), p. 1, right column, bottom, reads, in part: "The primary function of the rules is to advise the public of the rules which ... must be followed before the USPTO". Would you please rewrite the beginning part of that sentence for clarity? It seems to me a bit redundant. Suggestion: "The rules govern conduct of examiners, applicants, and patent practitioners before the Office. The rules are available ...more »

Submitted by (@chrisw)
1 comment

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active